[ffresh]

Originally Posted by Maker

Your examples are great. However, since a CDD is not an HOA, everything related to HOA rules is not relevant here. Conclusions made based upon that information are wrong.

A CDD exists a subpart of state government as a regulated agency. Therefore it does fall under the scope of Reed v Gilbert. Therefore a CDD cannot do anything to restrict speech, and therefore lacks legal authority to take any enforcement actions. The government, and all it far reaching agencies and related organizations, are bound by Reed. Opinions against that are simply wrong.

As far as I am concerned, this issue is closed. Tired of your mis-quotes, invalid arguments based upon invalid criteria, and your attacking attitude (that violates the rules here). The law is clear, and if you choose to ignore it, that's your problem.