[Normal]

Originally Posted by VAtoFLA

If it's the boogeyman landlord that you are after, a hard limit is the only way. They will just pass the $10 to the tenant. Problem with a hard limit is when a non-landlord villager hits that limit and then simply can't have guests.

This is all a made up problem to me. None of it will reduce our amenity fee and guests, while they certainly have impact on the amenities don't impact them substantially. The vast majority of amenity cost and maintenance are fixed costs.

I disagree with your assessment. But you have a right to an opinion.

Wear and Tear is a cost and a mathematical absolute. Additional users do cost additional funds. Extra money collected can offset costs.

There is nothing wrong with charging a landlord who exploits the loopholes of an antiquated system for their own personal gain.

Most of us could care less if a landlord has to charge a higher price for their rental. All of us should care about our neighbors who have problems with the current amenity fee or costs.