Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrenandKathy
But renters have a much right to the amenities as anyone.
Landlords pay their fees and only one group at a time of renters have access to the facilities at a time so I’m not sure what additional wear and tear they would be responsible for.
If anything unless fully booked which certainly isn’t the case lately there would be less use by properties owned by landlords then full time residents.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Normal
Incorrect. A landlord still has their Full Time Residence pass. The best fix is to just have the landlord pay the transfer fees of their residence pass to correctly assign a “tenant” the privileges for living in the house. It should be done each and every change of any tenant. Duplicity and cheating should be removed from the system both completely and correctly.
|
Which part is incorrect?
- Renters have as much rights to the amenities? That is true
- Landlords pay their fees? That is true
- Only one group of renters have access to the amenities at a time? That is true
- No additional wear and tear on the amenities? That is true, a resident, guest, or renter all look the same to the carpet and roof.
- A partially booked rental will use fewer amenities than a full-time resident? Arguable since not all full-time usage is the same.
A landlord may or may not retain their resident ID. If they are not present then they aren't using the amenities and the argument above is correct. If they are present in the home then there is little difference from me having friends come to visit. If they are present because they own two homes then they aren't utilizing the amenities from the rented home and the above is again correct.