Quote:
Originally Posted by billethkid
of a cross hair to "target" the democratic seats to upset in November. The terminology of "targeting" has been used for who knows how long without commentary. As is the use of a cross hair on a subject to infer "targeting".
None of which ever intended the use of violence in anyway what so ever....until now. The distortion of the intent by using these terms and graphics only confirms the lengths the hypocritical opposition will take.
And of course that the persona involved, Palin, is their constant "target".
Hence trying to get the public at large off the real subject....a tactic that has worn out it's use and or contributed value on thinking Americans.
Finally the silent majority is beginning to stir and some are getting nervous about it and continue to discredit actions "aimed" at standing and being counted.....
I find it utterly amusing in this era of the words are mightier than the deeds that some media and individuals have the nerve to criticize others.
How consistently hypocritical!!!!!!!!!!!!
btk
|
Targeting can be indicated without using a gun sight symbol! The use of this symbol implies the use of a gun which, by its nature, is violent. In light of the nasty crowds using the N word and spitting on elected officals.....gas line being cut. One simply cannot look the other way.
And geez I thought Bush was the constant target of the liberals not Palin.