Quote:
Originally Posted by RichieLion
You made my point Cologal. Thank You!!! The Supreme Court, by law, can not view an issue except by how it complies with the Constitution. There is no room for "eye of the beholder". The law is the law Cologal. If the law is flawed, as you seem to think so, it has to be changed by the House and the Senate in accordance to the Constitution. The Supreme Court has no role in the making of law. When it does it's unConstitutional.
Also, again, the case you cite was written by Justice Kennedy. Usually he's one of "yours".
|
The law is subject to interpretation that's how we come to have your and mine as you say. I said judicial activism is in the eye of the beholder.
Somewhere something says " We the people" not "We the corporations"