Quote:
Originally Posted by saratogaman
Surely you jest...Meirs was so unfit for the position that even Bush's Republican friends in Congress opposed her. That's why the nomination was withdrawn.
There's no comparison. The nominee has argued before the Supreme Court as Solicitor General so she knows the court very well.
|
This is exactly the same as the Harriet Meirs nomination. A person with no judicial experience is being nominated for the highest court in the land.
The difference is that, in general and in the case of Harriet Meirs, is that the Republicans were more true to their values than Democrats. Republicans saw an inexperienced candidate and balked at confirming that candidate. The Democrats know Kagan is unqualified but they're a bunch of rubber-stamping, valueless, kool-aid drinking sycophants of the Obama Regime.