Quote:
Originally Posted by RichieLion
No, activism is not in the eye of the beholder.
Judicial Activism is when the Supreme Court makes law by its decisions with a fanciful reading of supposed or alleged intent of the Constitution nx its authors...when there is nothing in the written document to support the point.
Your view of Judicial Activism is when the Supreme Court does not agree with a view of yours.
|
Please quote chapter and verse from the Constitution that gives corporations and unions equal standing with individuals...people...and are guaranteed unlimited ability to influences elections with unlimited contributions.
How can a strict constructionist support that decision and say it was not judicial activism?