Quote:
Originally Posted by RichieLion
You are correct. Cologal can defend Obama because he rarely says anything of substance. His appointed lackeys speak to the masses and carry out the details of the agenda and give the President "deniable plausibility". In this way Obama seeks to distance himself from the tactile working of his policy and feign ignorance at discrepancies of what is said, and what is done.
|
In this case I defend him because he didn't actually say this.....so if he didn't say it, no matter what anyone says, HE DIDN'T.
As opposed to Clinton under oath lying about have sex with ML. Or Bush saying that the US never used torture which we did.