Talk of The Villages Florida - View Single Post - Guessing Game...
View Single Post
 
Old 09-03-2010, 12:28 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chelsea24 View Post
I think you have that backwards Bucco. The word "liberal" was turned into a bad thing, because conservatives believe or believed that only "THEY" are for all of those things and only "THEY" are patriot. (Remember when the conservatives were in a tizzy over Obama not wearing a flag pin???) Conservatives love to talk about what shouldn't be done as a solution to a problem, as opposed to what should be done as a solution.

I watched David Gregory on Meet the Press ask John Boehner 4 times, 4 times how the Republicans would pay for tax cuts. No answer. It was interesting that in this particular episode of West Wing, written years ago, the same question came up in the debate. Again, no answer from the Republican candidate. Some things never change.
Chelsea, The question of how you pay for tax cuts assumes an unchanging economy. The same factories will produce the same good at the same price. There will be no increase or decrease in economic activity. I think we can all agree that the idea of an unchanging economy makes no sense. To understand the impact of tax cuts, you have to realize that we have a dynamic and changing economy.

During our lifetime we have seen three major Federal tax cuts. The first and most radical was done during the JFK administration. It did result in economic and tax collection growth. That income growth was lost when LBJ pursued a policy of 'guns and butter'. We could fund the Vietnam war AND the Great Society programs without any corresponding sacrifice on the part of the American people - we needed to stop entitlement growth and did not.

The second tax cut came during the Reagan administration. It brought us out of the highest interest rates and highest unemployment since the great depression. Revenues skyrocketed and the nation was prosperous until late in the Clinton administration. Unfortunate, we once again made the mistake of thinking we could fight a war/wars while increasing entitlements.

The third taz cut under the Bush administration. At the time, the economy was contracting and the situation was seriously exacerbated by the events of 9/11. Despite this, Federal government income again grew. Once again the opportunity to put our country on a sound fiscal footing was thrown away by spending on a war and concurrently increasing entitlements. We spent like drunken sailors and grew the Federal Government at a time we needed to shrink it.

This has been a bipartisan exercise in stupidity. Both parties competed in seeing how much they could promise the voters so they could come to power in the next election. They did this knowing that the entitlements promised (including bloated government pensions) could never be met.

Right now we are looking at a significant tax increase - the end of the Bush tax cuts. The easily foreseen result of this action will be the opposite of the results of the previous tax cuts - our Federal Government income will fall and our deficits will continue to explode.

Putting our economy right will require both maintaining the Bush tax cuts and serious reduction in government expenditures at all levels. I hope we can find leaders with the courage to do what needs to be done.