[QUOTE=784caroline;295774]************************************************** ****
"According to the Dept of REC , "Lake Miona staff was approached by two females that there was an alleged male in the women’s restroom shower". NO WHERE is the term ATTACK used or even implied as it was used in the original post. I think that qualifies as "Embellishment" since attack truly implies a significant and serious event."
As it turns out, Pk's post was correct. According to John Rohan (director of recreation) a report was made to the staff of Lake Miona by two women.
Since Mr. Rohan did not discuss the specifics of this case, it is ridiculous to declare that the word “attack” is an “exaggeration” of what actually happened.
Even if the woman in this case had not been “physically attack,” she was certainly “psychologically attack.”
Furthermore, since Mr. Rohan failed to provide the time and date on which the incident occurred, should one jump to the conclusion that this incident never happened?
Annabelle
|