Quote:
Originally Posted by redwitch
Sigh, what a brouhaha over nothing. Bison Valley residents have the same rights anyone living outside of TV does -- they can shop here; they can visit the squares; they can enjoy our restaurants; they can join and attend the public service/support group clubs meeting in the rec centers; their kids can attend the charter schools IF they are employees of TV. If their parents happen to live in TV, they can get the tri-county guest passes which allows them use of all the amenities so long as they are accompanied by their "host." The one thing they have that other tri-county residents don't have is true golf cart access (yes, others like Spruce Creek can travel to TV in carts but it is not as easy and involves dirt roads).
Now, I'm going to get blasted for this but I think it would be nice if Bison Valley residents could use our amenities if they are employees of TV (not the ones living there to be near their parents). TV employees are notoriously low paid. It wouldn't hurt us to thank them by allowing their kids to use the neighborhood pools on a hot summer day, by allowing the parent to join the clubs. Yes, a few would behave inappropriately (so do some TVers), but the majority would treat the amenties with respect since it is part of their community. This is a bill we could easily foot since we are already paying these fees -- it would cost us nothing in the dollar sense. Would it make the pools and rec centers a little more crowded? Yes, but only in the winter when the snowbirds are here and, let's face it, everything is crowded then. (And maybe even less of an impact than expected since kids would be in school and have homework, etc.)
I know the majority of you totally disagree with this and are worried that it would spill over to all residents of the Tri-Counties, but I don't think so. We are talking of a very small group -- not even all TV employees, just those living in one small area and, remember, not everyone living there works for TV. So, blast away.
|
Hi Red,
Is your suggestion that if you work for TV and live in Bison Valley, you can use TV amenities; but if you work for TV and live nearby but not in Bison Valley, you cannot use TV amenities? If so, help me understand the rationale.
If family use of TV amenities were offered as an employee benefit, how could this benefit be offered only to residents of Bison Valley? Because the same developer built it? Bet other employees would resent the heck out of that-- if not sue for discrimination. Developers of competing subdivisions might try to challenge the legality as well.
And if you opened TV amenities to families of all employees, nice as it sounds, it's no longer an age-restricted community, overcrowding would be an issue, etc.
What am I missing?