[jjdees]

TH, the media has crafted it's own reputation of having an agenda, thus very many people look upon the media as diggers of dirt rather than news. A good example is Dan Rather who created his own dirt with false records on GWB and the AP who sent dozens of investigators to Alaska to dig up dirt on Palin. That's not what we look to our news sources to provide.

As far as the Morse story, why did the authorities wait 4 years to bring charges? It's not like a long trail of intrigue that required a lot of research. If they had the info on the transgressions in 2006, 2007, 2008, why the wait to press charges? If they didn't have the info where did they get it?

How did they know that Morse possessed a mule deer in '06? If they found out back then, why the wait? The same goes for how they gained knowledge of a switched tag, wounding an animal with an arrow, possession of other animals, illegal hunts, etc. It sounds like there was a whistle blower in the background or maybe with the hunting party. If so, I would hope it's a valid charge, not one that's driven by some other agenda against a high profile person.