View Single Post
 
Old 12-11-2010, 05:18 PM
iandwk iandwk is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 339
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoosierb4 View Post
iandwk...It's true that sometimes the scientists can be wrong. But, in this case the predictions, made with mathematical models, clearly point to warming and measurements are supporting the predictions. The nature of global warming substances is that they allow the radiation from the sun to pass through to the ground, but absorb much of the longer wavelength radiation from the ground before it escapes to space. It's fairly straightforward when you look at a simplified model. It's sort of the opposite of what clouds do. The really complicated part of it is when you look at a a 3-d model of the entire atmosphere and the earth's surface.

What is true is that natural effects like solar activity can overwhelm the effects of what we do by putting more CO2 in the atmosphere. But, the "global warming" that we are concerned with is superimposed on top of the natural cycles.
I think my main gripe is the fact that they blame it on our activities, if it is indeed happening. If it is happening and if we are causing it, I wish the politicians would stay out of it and quit using it to promote their agendas, such as cap and trade and numerous others. They try to guilt us into buying into their agendas. Then it becomes rep vs. dem and there goes the price of all of our commodities. Then they try to start raising taxes to take even more, all in the name of whatever their current agenda happens to be.
__________________
If I'd known I was gonna live this long, I'd have taken better care of myself. Eubie Blake