During the debate prior to the passage of what is now called "Obamacare", it was often said, by members of both political parties, that everyone could agree on about 80% of the bill's content. The differences of opinion was reported to be on only 20% of the bill's content.

If that's the case, why has the House scheduled a vote to repeal the entire bill?

If this step is supposed to precede the crafting of new legislation to address the very real and well-known problem of unsustainable escalation of health care costs, I haven't heard the sponsors of the "repeal bill" say so.

It kind of leaves the question open, doesn't it...is this proposed bill just more political posturing and bickering or is it a serious attempt at governance?