Quote:
Originally Posted by ijusluvit
No, I don't defend everything the Administration does. I have defended some things for very specific reasons which I try to formulate carefully and factually. What I rarely do is cite the words of others, especially "experts" to form my opinions.
But I do get tired of reading sweeping indictments of governmental agents or agencies, especially when it is obviously done to further one's incredible bias against a particular Administration.
My original response to you said the information disclosed had no import as "secret" information any longer. it could be used instead as public evidence to the world and other terrorists that the mission had been successful. That's a good message to send.
Here's my challenge to you: make a case, if you can, to bolster your sweeping indictment. Find some specific data among that which was released and then SHOW how publication of that data is detrimental to the national interest.
|
I glad you have intimate communications with the administration and that they're advising you on their national security strategies.
I didn't say any info was released, only that it was reported that Al Qaeda documents were found which contained sensitive info. Even that leak is amateurish, in my humble opinion.