Reading the comments it becomes clear what the jurors are asking themselves. Keep in mind that it maybe both Goege and cindy Anthony are in a Cach 22. They have to defend allegations made against them by Baez and also probably conflited concerning helping the State convict their daughter. Also keep in mind that the attornys will make it appea that a defendant and or witnesses should have acted a certain way. As an example[U] they were critical of the manager at the tow service as to why if he knew the odor was of human decomposition why didn't he immediately call the police. It could have been for a number of reasons or none as he may have questioned what would have happened if he did and it amounted to nothing. Or perhaps he didn't want to gt involved. and if it was the latter do you think he would embarrrass himself with millions of people watching and with a question of how the police would have reacted. The point I am trying to make is that an attorney will make it appear that only one action or reaction should have occurred but that is not life. It is the same with George he took that car home to 1) cover up for his daughter 2) bot sure of what was going on and wanted to investigate more or 3) really never gave a thought to foul play. why becauseit was too personal it was his immediate family and he went brain dead. Bottom line this child was missing for 31 days and her mother mae no attempt to locate her. the jury is not going to get pass that one...and why Baez made up the drowning scenario.
|