Quote:
Originally Posted by SwampCreature
It's pretty amazing the lengths people will go to explain away Palin's cluelessness. A complete self-consistent (or not self-consistent) alternate universe does not have to be created. Sometimes the simple explanation is the correct explanation: the woman is just stupid. Nothing more, nothing less.
It is true that the commonly believed account of Paul Revere leaves something to be desired, being based more on Longfellow's poem than actual events. But this still doesn't justify the elaborate explanations for Palin.
As an aside, the George Washington cherry tree story is also highly suspect. I hope that doesn't shatter too many people's belief systems.
|
It amazes me that starting with the last election, the left chose to attack Palin by calling her stupid..
Now that she has made millions, overshadowed all of the other candidates including Obama and Romney, they are calling her shrewd and clever to describe how she has made millions, and can take over the national stage any time she wants to. Some even have the timidity to say it is because of her "looks" and she is an "attractive" candidate. The stupid approach is out.. you need to get on the new liberal talking points.. she is a greedy "attractive" megalomaniac who uses her "looks" to get attention and she is only in it for the publicity and the money!
jj