Thanks Skyguy79 as that was my point. It is refreshing to hear opinions but
they should not get confused with the law when it comes to proof. Also, I think in a capital case the state must prove beyond a doubt.
My personal opinion is that they have failed to prove she actually did murder even though I also believe she is one heck of a poor excuse for a mother and human being?
In addition I think the state made a number of errors and that it is reasoneble to assume that if she is convicted it may/will be turned around on appeal. I think the 4th state's attorney in the room was the Judge. He sustained almost every state objection and overruled almost all of the defense
objections. The defense has had a hard enought problem in trying to get her
off, (not that I agree with this) and the Judge would not let them fairly
represent her in the trial.
Please understand this in no way means I think she is innocent.
