Just out of curiosity, Were you a defense attorney?....I can give you as many attorneys that feel the prosecution is doing an OUTSTANDING job and Baez is a dirt bag.....As far as bias by the Judge, that is a bunch of crap!.....If anything he has been more than accommodating to that little liars sneaky attorney!!!!......If you don't think that Baez didn't have an ulterior motive for accommodating the court order, that is very sad.....I will give you this, Baez certainly did not have the resources that OJ Simpson had and for that reason he has resorted to sneaky legal maneuvers...
Quote:
Originally Posted by PennBF
I think the real dirty tricks are coming from the State. To illustrate why I say this: (a) The state attorney's continue to object in order to destroy any
continuance of statements by the witness. Is this legal..? Yes. Is it a trick to divert the testimony..? Yes, (b) The State fully recognizes they have the judge in their pocket and are using it to their advantage. Last night Greta
VanSustren said that in all of her experiences she has never witnessed a judge so bias against a defense..So it is not just me saying it. This was followed up by additional attorney's agreeing. (c) the state gave the defense a copy or original hard drive from the family laptop. Rather than identifying
what they may discuss they left open all items on the laptop. I can assure you that if I gave someone my hard drive, said I might pick some things off for proof it would take the full staff of the Dept of Commerce of the US to determine potential usage. It was unfair and a trick. There are many more but too many to put in a note. (d) I have to also add, how many times have you heard the State Attorney say: "Are you telling me?" or Are you saying that"? These are all leading questions but how many times have you heard the judge tell him to restate his question??
Just some thoughts..  |