Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeda
The only thing that I heard about a bone being in the 'muck' was when Ashton was cross-examining the female defense botanist, and he asked her about a hip bone that he said was buried about 4 inches into the muck when the remains were found. (That was when she replied that that would mean that either the bone would have been there more than two weeks, or that the other explanation for it being buried that deeply was that a dog or coyote could have buried it).
I haven't heard all of the testimony though; did someone testify that the skull was also partially buried when it was found, since Kronk's phone call clearly says that the skull rolled out of the bag when he poked at it with his meter stick?
|
Freeda, look at post #229. Jeff Ashton, the prosecutor, even
demonstrated how deep the skull was in muck on his cross with Dr. Bock. Apparently, this may have been what the photos that were presented in court showed. To me, these discrepancies bring into question discovery of the remains site tampering (in all fairness to which Ashton would not have any involvement) by someone there. You're right, it was a portion of leg bone they were discussing as well as possibly being buried 4 inches in the muck by animals .
I'm not sure what a lot of this has to do with anything because whatever happened was not right...a child is dead. I just think there are too many fabrications all around and they are coming from both sides. Roy Kronk was not even consistent in what he said (sometimes he used his meter stick; another time, he picked up the bag and it rolled out; etc.) To me, what's important is the truth....not victories and/or the politics of anyone. Caylee is the one who deserves the victory....the truth.