View Single Post
 
Old 06-29-2011, 08:00 PM
ladydoc ladydoc is offline
Gold member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: BUTTONWOOD
Posts: 1,019
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bike42 View Post
Pages 14-15-16 of the July POA Bulletin give Diane Tucker's response, which I THINK says the District has no jurisdiction over dogs off leash ON your property because that is not "use or appearance of 'real property'". All three counties' leash laws require dogs to be on leashes when off your property (we knew that).

I take this to mean that invisible fences are OK and dogs do not need to be on leash if they are contained on your own property.

What do you think?

If you don't have a copy, you can download the POA bulletin at http://www.poa4us.org/bulletins_file...etin201107.pdf
That would seem to be perfectly reasonable, logical and correct. So it is probably wrong. NO, just kidding. Why go through the expense of an underground fence if you have to keep your furry kid on leash? I do not intend to keep the kids on a leash in our fenced courtyard...
__________________
Chicago, Lincoln Nebraska, Rochester NY, SE Ohio, Oklahoma, California, New Mexico and BUTTONWOOD