Quote:
Originally Posted by NJblue
What bothered me about the result was the way the defense team celebrated with hugs and tears for Casey. It's one thing to think she may not be guilty - or at least beyond reasonable doubt, but it's quite another to think that she is actually innocent. How can any rational being think, with a clear head, that she is innocent of all the serious charges?
For the defense team to actually think that she was innocent meant that they believed her final iteration of her story - that Caly drowned and then Casey and her father were involved in an elaborate cover-up that included duct tape and disposing of the body in a swamp. That is such a far fetched story to believe that I can't imagine a rational person believing it. But, supposing that the defense team actually believed it, how can they then embrace someone who so callously disregarded the body of her child? They accused Kronk of being morally bankrupt. I would say that that charge belongs to them.
|
would you register the same complaint if the prosecution were celebrating?
How can any rational person think with a clear head that she is innocent of all the serious charges?
Evidently you believe that a jury of 12 irrational people got together to find her not guilty.
I don't understand why people who insinuate that they themselves are rational cannot look at the evidence is circumstantial evidence and see that it was flawed. If you go to the emotional evidence the innuendo that Casey is a slut evidence I'm sure that you would find that reason, the execut, her.
I don't know what happened. You don't know what happened. I am sure that Casey Anthony is guilty of something but I don't know what that is. Do you?
A child has died everybody feels that someone must pay. But if the true story is that she drowned. Would that satisfy you? I doubt it. Some people are not going to be satisfied by anything other than execution because she allegedly threw the child away in a dump.
Take all of the emotion out and only look at the facts as presented and rebutted. Would you be convinced?
C