Quote:
Originally Posted by graciegirl
circumstantial cases have won before too.
|
yes but most of the time they could answer at least one of these things with hard scientific evidence:
HOW did the person die?
WHEN did the person die?
WHAT was the exact method used to kill?
evidence to point to EXACTLY who did it.
Looking back at this case I don't think either was convincingly proved.
Do I think she did it? Heck yes. I can only hope that the justice system works as well for me or someone I know if we are improperly accused.