Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ_Boston
As the Florida AG said: "this was a dry bones case, and they are tough to prove".
In many ways this was the opposite of the OJ case. That case had much more valid scientific evidence due to the blood etc.. The problem there was a good case by the defense which had their own contradictory science.
|
Wow.. If the Prosecution now admits it was a tough case to prove, why the heck did they charge it as a death penalty case? NO ONE should be in favor of pursuing the death penalty in cases where it is tough to prove what happened or who did it. NEVER!! WE do not want to kill innocent people.
AND THAT IS WHY this jury found her not guilty.. the Prosecution FORCED Them to say if they convicted her, they could recommend the death penalty... and no reasonable person could sleep at night putting her to death on this crappy case.
This is why there have been HUNDREDS of people PROVEN INNOCENT to have been falsely convicted of MURDER and other serious crimes.. some facing the death penalty. Go to the Innocence project if you think I am kidding.
JJ