Quote:
Originally Posted by djplong
You keep puching that "8%" number when there's no evidence showing a causal link (these days) between raising that number and results.
Remember. Corporations these days are run FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS. That is their NUMBER ONE loyalty.
Put someone from the private sector in charge and you can expect them to behave in a manner that will benefit HIS owners (read: campaign contributors).
Again, read what I wrote - damned if you do and damned if you don't. It's like nobody knows what "the happy medium" would feel like if it came up and BIT them in thigh!
|
Yes, it is 8%. When you stock your administration with Ivy league idealists and socialists, you only get the prospective of left-leaning progressive people who do not know anything about real monetary obligations. Social engineering is their forte.