Quote:
Originally Posted by rubicon
You are venting your frustration and anger at the wrong people. It should be directed (1) at those responsible for this issue (2) those in authority that have a responsibility to keep residents fully informed of the issues and potential consequences, etc. Instead they continue to obfuscate the entire matter only inviting dialogue as we are witnessing here in this thread.
If they did their job we would not be speaking in "what ifs" and "suppose thats". We would not be admonishing one another instead we would be focusing on plan to protect our interests
As to the special lawyers/bond consul I imagine they issed bonds based on written documents assumed to be completed accurately and in fill. If those making application lied or misled the bond consul then who has the laboring oar? And as much as some won't like this this is another "what if" .
Again, I am not losing sleep over this because one way or another there are various remedies, whatever the initial outcome.  |
My apology. I got ahead of myself on a portion of this post inreference to the special lawyers, bond consul and the application for bonds. In all application for contracts the issuer releis on information prsented in the application. Information cannot be misleading, concealed or omitted. The application requires a signature that the information contained is true and accurate. If it is not then the contract is invalidated. Usually there i a protracted investigation. There are several expalantions as to why information was omitted, concealed or misleading. It does not mean any there was some sort of sinster plot. It could all be an honest mistake.