Quote:
Originally Posted by rubicon
EdVinMass> I didn't mean to offend you or anyone. One option in the decision model is to do nothing. I happen not to agree with that choice here. I detest lawsuits for more reasons than you can imagine. But residents need
an independent review and assessment of their financial exposure.
I personally believe that the Developer, Village Voice, Daily Sun and POA monitor threads on TOTV and rightly so. I am not an officer of any organization here and have no authority to act in behalf of residents. So your comment concerning my backing up words with actions is a little unkind
|
While you have no authority to act on behalf of residents, you can always act on behalf of yourself.
I have explained previously why I don't think that a lawsuit, at this time, is feasible. You feel otherwise. As EdVin suggested, please go ahead and take the initiative. You can take the initiative by doing one or more of the following:
1. retain an attorney to sue on your behalf;
2. go to a POA meeting and explain why you think that the POA should bring a lawsuit now; or
3. if you really want to have some fun, raise your thoughts at a VHA meeting and try to talk the VHA into actually acting on behalf or residents when there is a conflict between the residents' interests and those of the Developer.
If you do anything along those lines, I sincerely wish you success. I just am doubtful that anybody can bring a successful lawsuit unless and until the amenity-system takes a hit because of the outcome of the IRS investigation. Unless and until that happens, what are your damages? If you can answer that and prove your damages, you probably have the makings for a successful lawsuit.