Talk of The Villages Florida - View Single Post - My Evaluation of the Candidates Performance at the Debate
View Single Post
 
Old 08-12-2011, 04:41 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default My Evaluation of the Candidates Performance at the Debate

The first political debate of this presidential primary season was held Friday night in Ames, Iowa. Here is my take on it:

Mitt Romney – Looked and acted Presidential. Laid out clearly what he would try to do as President. His background in private industry and government shows him to be a capable leader. Grade - A

Michele Bachman – Far too insistent on how she ‘fights’ for things and people. No executive experience. Almost as far to the right as Obama is to the left. Grade - D

Herman Cain – An intelligent, accomplished businessman who knows how to lead and how to move quickly when required. No government experience, but that may be a plus. Would need a VP with strong International experience (Huntsman?).
Grade – B-

Ron Paul – the gadfly of the group. A consistently ‘out-of-the-box’ thinker. He favors actions that keep us out of other nation’s business and increase international trade. Cannot be seriously considered, but his ideas should be taken seriously. Grade - C

Rick Santorum – No charisma and no campaign war chest. – It’s time for him to go home. Grade - F

Tim Pawlenty – See Rick Santorum above. Grade - F

Newt Gingrich – Incredibly intelligent and has a proven ability to work across the aisle. Loaded with personal baggage that makes him unelectable. Like Ron Paul, his ideas deserve serious consideration. Grade - C

Jon Huntsman – Great domestic and international credentials. Just joined the race and has yet to spell out his ideas. Grade – Inc.