It would seem logical that if someone actually tourted and abused an
animal they should be identified, (e.g.sexual offenders, etc.). They have
deomonstrated a lack of a moral compass and it would be reasonable to
assume this lack would not be restricted to (a) animals and (b) stopped
as soon as they were released after a year and a half?
I don't think I would feel comfortable living next door to a person who
was so lacking in feelings and conscience as to easily watch animals be
abused and killed and in fact be a active participant in such a horrible
activity..
