Quote:
Originally Posted by PennBF
It would seem logical that if someone actually tourted and abused an
animal they should be identified, (e.g.sexual offenders, etc.). They have
deomonstrated a lack of a moral compass and it would be reasonable to
assume this lack would not be restricted to (a) animals and (b) stopped
as soon as they were released after a year and a half?
I don't think I would feel comfortable living next door to a person who
was so lacking in feelings and conscience as to easily watch animals be
abused and killed and in fact be a active participant in such a horrible
activity..  |
In response to a) Yes, he did demonstrate a lack of moral compass and that's why he went to prison but to say just because he beat dogs that it would escalate to humans is ridiculous. That's like saying a guy who robs a candy store will rob a bank when he get's out.
In response to b) it stopped as soon as he was caught.
I get that you're passionate about this subject and I agree that what he did was wrong but some of your assumptions are out there.
And please stop with the
nonsense. It makes you sound as if you're the only one with an opinion that counts here and no one else's means anything.