Quote:
Originally Posted by Villages Kahuna
I sure wish it was different, but the bunch of seekers and naysayers who had the debate in New Hampshire tonight sure didn't have any ideas that sounded particularly compelling. One guy had a 59-point plan that was sleep-producing even before one got to a couple dozen points. Another guy said he'll tell us his plans later this week. Another kept repeating "9-9-9", a proposal that the people who evaluate such plans say won't even come close to balancing the budget.
They must really think their "base" is really dumb...or not paying attention.
|
Who are the people you refer to that evaluate such plans? Are they democrats? Socialists? Do they have names so that their neutrality, non-partisan judgement can be validated? Please.....please..... don't come back with your favorite source the New York Times.
Does the Obama administration using its Cloward-Piven strategy to bankrupt America and pave the way for pure socialism and redistribution of wealth through big government, appeal more to your ideology then what you pessimistically "wish was different?"
From Wikipedia: "The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined in 1966 by American sociologists and political activists Richard Cloward (1926–2001) and Frances Fox Piven (b. 1932) that called for overloading the U.S. public welfare system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the welfare system with a national system of "a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty".
By the way, Francis Fox Piven is still in the mix. I saw her on prime time news speaking in support of the "Occupy Wall Street" group in all her Marxist glory. Incidentally, Communist Party USA also supports the "occupiers".