Quote:
Originally Posted by buggyone
Ladydoc is a very educated person and is on the side of the page I am on. Richie is a very decent guy who I have gotten to know and is passionate about his views on Pro-Choice. Richie loves to argue a point and sometimes it seems it just for the point of arguement - but that is how some New Jersyites are from being in that state.
We have to excuse Katz and Village Golfer for...- well, we just have to excuse them.
Richie has stated his viewpoints from a religious point and Ladydoc has stated hers from a humanistic viewpoint. Both are passionate in their beliefs but the world has to go with Ladydoc. It is up to a woman to decide for herself and NOT up to politicians.
End of discussion.
|
End of Discussion? You sound pretty definite about that, but I object to your presumption.
My point of view is also scientific as well as religious. I also think it is scientifically apparent that the baby in the womb is a live human being. I say that from MY "humanist" viewpoint.
Being Christian myself, I've been focusing in illustrating the religious, to attempt to get Christians who are pro-choice to try to visualize themselves as also being pro-murder in the eyes of their avowed faith. No "Christian" has, in fact, responded to this part of my discussion directly. Believe me, I know why, and they know who else also knows why.
You say politicians, but you really mean legislators. It is legislators who make the laws in this society. Except of course in the case of "abortion rights" where the law was improperly made by activist judges, when The Supreme Court invented the right to privacy and applied it to the case of Roe v. Wade.