Quote:
Originally Posted by djplong
This clearly shows that you do not know the meaning of the words "socialist" and "communist".
If Obama were communist, do you think Citigroup and General Motors would be in private hands? Here's a hint - the government has divested their positions in those two corporations.
Now, if you said he has "socialistic policies", you might have something there. But this is the reason you get the kinds of responses you get. We're still paying for Bush's wars and other disastrous policies (which, to be fair, he wasn't alone in) but if anyone brings that up, it's "well, it's Obama's now and he hasn't fixed it all".
|
Look, we all know you have a tendency to defend Obama. I will show you his hypocrisy. When he took office he went around the world bowing to tyrants and other so-called leaders and telling the world that the USA was not an exceptional country. For 3 years he did not care if Americans were working and paid no attention to any kind of legislation that would put people back to work.
All of a sudden, he goes into campaign mode and wants a "jobs bill" that is really another Stimulus handout to the public sector unions and will not help the 90% of Americans that are in the private sector. He is also giving speeches lately saying how great the USA is. HUH?
He must think we all have short memories.
I don;t care what "ism" you put at the end of his policies, he is trying to redistribute wealth and shamelessly pitting the classes against each other.
He has always been a divide and conquer person, not a uniter.