Quote:
Originally Posted by notlongnow
I like this idea.
Of the three you listed I pick none so far. I am a Reb. and have voted that way for as long as I can remember. However I can't put my finger on it but I can't get behind Romney. There is something missing there. I wish I knew but he just does not pass my gut feeling test.
Huntsman makes sense but when I hear him speak or debate he seems "canned". Like he is too sure of what he is saying because maybe he is saying what he is told to say. Also not sure if he would run from the right and govern more center left.
I really like Newt. I think he could debate Obamas butt into the ground. He seems to be better when debating one person than in the circus like setting the candidates are in now. My problem with him is he has SO MUCH history to go back and dig up to derail his campaign if he was nominated. I think he would be beat into the ground by the left and the left leaning media.I would vote for him if he got the nomination but I would not have a good feeling, kinda like I had with McCain.
I am looking for a reason to get behind someone. I like Cain but I don't think he will make it through the campaign season by the time the left are finished with him. How hipocritical of the libs to attack ANYBODY on sexual harassment basis.
MY TWO CENTS.
|
So his BEHAVIOR is not the problem..it is the reporting of his behavior that is the problem?