Quote:
Originally Posted by eweissenbach
It is incredibly disappointing to me that there seems to be so little outrage over Nordquist's hold on congress and tax issues. I knew of Nordquist and his excessive power prior to the Sixty Minutes peice, but it shined an additional bright light on this despot. I suppose some on the far right will claim it was a typical hatchet job from the liberal media. How can so many people be fooled into supporting this self-destructive fiscal policy? Nordquist does not care about this country, or at least the vast majority of people who make it up.
|
So why did not the other, numerous liberal-bent t.v. networks do such a similar exposé a long time ago?
Could it be that they don't mind his connections to Muslim Brotherhood?
"Perry: The Islamic Society of North America is the leading edge of the Brotherhood movement here, yet it remains a formal outreach partner of the government even though ISNA was implicated in a criminal scheme to funnel over $12 million to Hamas terrorists. Its president, in fact, just spoke at a Justice Department conference on “post-9/11 discrimination.”
Mohamed Magid also prayed with Obama in the White House. It’s not just Obama though. I’ve seen the matrix with all the names of the leaders in the U.S. Brotherhood’s Shurah Council. They include people Bush prayed with after 9/11.
The enemy has been inside the wire for quite some time. It’s just making deeper inroads now.
FP: Ok let’s get to Suhail Khan and Grover Norquist. What information do you have on them?
Sperry: Let me start with some background regarding Norquist. Though he’s known as the Beltway’s top antitax lobbyist, he’s also a paid lobbyist for enemies of the United States. Prior to 9/11, he was bankrolled by the General Masul of the U.S. Brotherhood — the same Alamoudi I mentioned earlier — who also happened to be al-Qaida’s top bagman in America."
http://frontpagemag.com/2011/11/08/t...ublican-party/