Quote:
Originally Posted by buggyone
"fiction as this..."As to a fetus not being a part of a woman's body...that is just too far out to even give any credence to."
Katz's statement has me somewhat confused. She is saying that it is fiction to believe that a fetus is not part of a woman's body? Or is she saying it is fiction to believe a fetus is part of a woman's body.
A simple knowledge of biology knows that it is the woman's body where a fetus is formed and grows. If you do not have that woman's body, you cannot have a fetus - except for the petri dish conceptions and medical machines, etc. Of course, it is part of the woman's body.
|
She is saying that a fetus is NOT part of a woman's body and says this because she thinks that this negates the position that a woman should have control of her own body. Interesting, no?