Being charged and being convicted are seriously different. Thus, I tried to speak to conviction in most of my references. Of course it does not make sense to continue to feed this thread as it has reached the point of less than thoughtful inputs. There was a point where it was mentioned they did not see large numbers in the paper. Of course they would not see a large number in any single edition. It is the accumulative numbers that count. Either this was to intentionally mislead the reader and distort the point or just not seeing the larger picture? As they say, "you make the call"???
