|
01-30-2012, 11:56 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bavarian
There is no difference between Romney and BHO. He is a radical, pro-abortion, Northeastern Liberal like Nelson Rockerfeller. He won't get rid or Obamacare, he made is own socialized medicine in Mass. before BHO.
|
Oh. This would be why......
"Jan. 19, 2012 - Massachusetts Citizens for Life President Anne Fox made the following statement on what she said are false attacks on Romney’s record:
“Since being elected governor, Mitt Romney has had a consistent commitment to the culture of life. As governor, he worked closely with Massachusetts Citizens for Life. Misguided attempts to blame Mitt Romney for the fact that state-funded health care in Massachusetts funds abortion ignore the facts. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled in 1981 that the Massachusetts Constitution requires the funding of abortion. This decision forces Massachusetts to fund abortion to the same extent it funds other medical procedures. A 1986 attempt to overturn the court ruling with a Constitutional Amendment failed. Obviously, in providing health coverage, the governor and the legislature were bound by this decision.”
Fox’s comments mirror those from David French, Senior Counsel at American Center for Law and Justice and former attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund:
Let’s make one thing perfectly clear, any abortion coverage contained in Massachusetts insurance plans is required by Massachusetts legal precedent that Mitt could not alter.......
Mitt Romney is "Consistently" Pro-Life, Mass Activist Says | LifeNews.com
|