Quote:
Originally Posted by djplong
Richie: I think you're right AND wrong.
Democrats gaming the system for political advantage? No question. It's all a game to BOTH parties inside the Beltway.
But I think you're wrong in thinkink that the goal is to make the Republican break their No Taxes pledge. I think the goal, if I were to put on my Sinister Black Hat, would be to say "Ok, fine - what do you cut?" and when the republicans finally DO come up with something it falls into one of two categories: 1) It's not nearly enough (you just can't get the cash from discretionary spending) or 2) You're cutting vital services and starving people (with some added bluster for good measure). With #2, you get the people all riled up and they come out with torches and pitchforks at the next election.
The problem with the Republicans is that pledge - it offers no room for compromise - something which the so-called patron saint of the current GOP, Ronald Reagan, was a master at.
So here they want to emulate Reagan without being allowed half the tools in Reagan's playbook. IMO, they've allowed themselves to be painted into a corner.
And, just for the record, please remember that I voted for Reagan as many times as I was legally allowed. He was the first President I ever voted for (as I turned 18 in 1980).
Of course, if you want to start a separate topic for where we'll "get" the trillion dollars to close the deficit, I'm more than ready to hear what you have to say. Someone posted a long list quite some time ago that added up to next to nothing because it didn't hit the Big Three in the budget (well, there's really a Big Four, but you can't just eliminate the interest on the public debt).
|
Compromise is but another word for "agreeing to higher taxes". Simple as that.
The Democrats always start talking about cuts to services that would hurt the most vulnerable Americans as a political ploy, as if those are the first things that could be cut. It's total garbage.
There are hundreds of billions of dollars of waste, and if you put in fraud, probably trillions.