Quote:
Originally Posted by cologal
So Rick Stantorum didn't say this:
In an interview with Jake Tapper on ABC News, Santorum reiterated his opposition to the Supreme Court’s 1965 ruling that prevented Connecticut from banning contraception.“The state has a right to do that, I have never questioned that the state has a right to do that," he said. "It is not a constitutional right. The state has the right to pass whatever statutes they have. That's the thing I have said about the activism of the Supreme Court--they are creating rights, and it should be left up to the people to decide."
There goes the lefty BS line......
|
Please provide a link so I can see the context of your claim.
I really do not see however what Santorum or the religious position against contraception has anything to do with my objection to our President (NOT our dictator) ORDERING a private business to provide goods and services FREE. Where does he get that authority? I totally agree with you that contraction should be the choice of the individual.
And worse yet, NOTHING is free.. His solution is to ORDER a business to give it to the objecting Catholics FREE which will mean that company will get that money from the non objectors to pay for the FREE objectors coverage. THAT is NOT fair.
Why not just say policies can include contraction or not, choice of the BUYER?
JJ