Well, I never said it was a Bible. Any time that you produce a summary like that, there are going to be some cases where interpretation might cause some movement in the numbers.

But what I really like about them is their individual entries. They don't just give a rating (from "True" to "Pants on Fire"). They go into detail about how and why they gave it that rating. As is the case with many incidents, when there are parts that are true and parts that aren't, they'll give you both parts. They also go to the mat trying to get clarification - contacting a candidate's office in many cases to get comments.

At least, if I disagree with Politifact, I'm going to know why.