Talk of The Villages Florida - View Single Post - Anyone use Snopes to check up on scams and the like??
View Single Post
 
Old 03-14-2012, 12:36 PM
loweglor loweglor is offline
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: The Villages
Posts: 68
Thanks: 1
Thanked 45 Times in 21 Posts
Default

Once again negative information has been disseminated about the PRESIDENT of the United States by someone who, obviously, does selective reading. If that person had truly done research and had not been so willing to accept the negativity, that person would have found out that the docket items in question revealed that NONE of the nine entries had anything at all to do with cases challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States: in fact, most of them actually stemmed from cases which were originally filed against the federal government long before the presidential candidacy of Barack Obama (but which since “rolled over” to the current administration. Check out the 9 cases for yourself:

Gary William HOLT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04-15848

Jerome Julius Brown v. BUSH et al. Case 1:08-cv-00013-UNA (filed 1/4/08)

Louis Edward Lutz, Jr. Case 1:07-cv-03280-NGG-LB, a truck driver who was employed as a U.S. Army civilian contractor in Iraq between 2004 to 2006 (long before the advent of the Obama administration) and whose case has to do with combatant status of civilian contractors and employees working in Iraq and Afghanistan, not presidential eligibility issues.

Two filings involving Abdul Hamid Abdul Salam Al-Ghizzawi, Misc. No. 08-442 (05-cv-02378, a Libyan citizen seeking release from his incarceration at Guantanamo Bay Naval Station. He was finally released in March 2010, after seven years of imprisonment.

Three filings involving Jamal Kiyemba, Case # 1:05-cv-01509-RMU, a Ugandan who was incarcerated at Guantanamo Bay Naval Station for four years beginning in 2002.

The Real Truth About Obama, Inc., Case 3:08-cv-00483-JRS, a case which, although the plaintiff’s name might suggest a presidential eligibility issue, is actually a challenge to three Federal Election Commission regulations which the plaintiff organization alleges are “unconstitutionally overboard” and thereby infringed their right “to disseminate information about presidential candidate Senator Obama’s position on abortion.