Quote:
Originally Posted by rubicon
It is really clever the way you weave in and out of your aforementioned remarks. If you really knew anything about Scalia you would know first of all he has a great sense of humor. You would also know that he has probably a digested all 2,700 pages of a law before the supreme Court convened on Monday, a law by the way that Congress passed and never read. You would also show as much concern about a balanced decision from the remaining eight justices.
|
Your insult notwithstanding, Scalia's record is clear. If you were forthcoming, you would agree he is one of the most predictably conservative justices in history. I take him at his word that he hasn't "digested all 2,700 pages" because we all know he has long ago made up his mind. Would you care to place a wager on how Scalia will vote in this case? Go ahead, make your proposal. His comment is the betrayal of a closed mind. He is really saying he doesn't have to read the law. And that, my friend, is not humor. It's arrogance and the height of irresponsible conduct.