Originally Posted by ijusluvit

Your insult notwithstanding, Scalia's record is clear. If you were forthcoming, you would agree he is one of the most predictably conservative justices in history. I take him at his word that he hasn't "digested all 2,700 pages" because we all know he has long ago made up his mind. Would you care to place a wager on how Scalia will vote in this case? Go ahead, make your proposal. His comment is the betrayal of a closed mind. He is really saying he doesn't have to read the law. And that, my friend, is not humor. It's arrogance and the height of irresponsible conduct.