PennBf:
Quote:
Originally Posted by PennBF
I am not sure why Janet is so invested in pushing this throuogh. At the last
SLCDD meeting the supervisors were asked to approve it BEFORE the CDD's voted and that was strange since if even one CDD objected it was over. One Supervisor asked the question as to why should they vote before the CDD's and there was no answer as to the procedure being requested and Janet was at the meeting. The Supervisors denied her request to vote then and said they should wait to see if the CDD"s were going to approve. Janet is usually logical so it is a loss to understand why she was trying to "push" this through? Who is behind it and WHY?
There is no question the Park is lovely and good for the residents. The question is paying for it! I will make an assumption. Lets assume the funding ultimately comes from Project Wide. Then a host of these could be built,
plus a number of other projects and there would be NO OVERSIGHT CONTORLS OF SPENDING. You will end up paying in your year end tax bill and they could spend as much as they want. It would be nice for Janet to get a request to spend money and not have to answer to anyone or have any controls over how much. Why would anyone want to give up a control in favor of no control. Does not make any sense. WHY?? |
PennBF: Janet's reasons are no mystery. You know why and you know how. Its politically correct name is "the long invisible hand."