No one ever said Janet was anything but a fine person. As I look at what some say are some examples of what will not be done if Oak Park is not funded by your future tax bills..just look at what has been done and not charged to your annual tax bill. In one note it was said, if there is a stink over Oak Park no more beautiful spaces like this one. That has no basis in fact. We have lots of places like this and NONE PAID FOR BY YOUR FUTURE TAX BILL ASSESSMENTS. All were done under the control of Amenity Fee spending cap'd at CPI or 3% and paid for by that line item in your monthly bill. No one said there is a "conspiracy" to change spending from control to no control . This is just a scare tatic to convince residents to disreagard good financial controls in favor of unrestricted out of contol spending. Would anyone like the ability to spend the other persons money and not have to account for it.
I sure would !! Unfortunately we are talking about spending YOUR MONEY!
Wouldn't life be easier for those spending not to have a CPI or 3% control. Darn right!! This is not rocket science. Just the need to recognize the practical side of these simple economic facts.
