Would much prefer to hear what YOU have to say and use something to validate it but most of us are well aware of what is in Wiki, and it has its purpose but is by intent very vague and general. PLUS it is better to hear what a poster thinks, not what they cut and pasted unless thats it I suppose

There is an article in the NYTIMES in the last week on the subject...read that one, and do some browsing on Goldberg (I am pretty sure of the name) who wrote a book on the media coverage in 2008. Then interpet, post and use them as validation