Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucco
snipped
In addition, as I understand it, since Obamas legislation to take away the secret ballot in union votes failed, "the NLRB leadership has imposed new requirements that employers supply union organizers with the names and home addresses of every employee. Nor do employees have a right to decline to have this personal information given out to union organizers, under NLRB rules."
I am posting two links, one from
RealClearPolitics - A Cynical Process and the other..
"http://www2.timesdispatch.com/news/rtd-opinion/2012/may/02/tdopin01-wrong-on-right-to-work-ar-1883388/
BOTH oppose this new regulation and cite how the "new" NLRB has top flight chances to kill job growth,
My question and it is a serious question...
WHY DOES A LABOR UNION NEED NAMES AND HOME ADDRESSES FOR EVERY EMPLOYEE AND DENY THE RIGHT OF THE EMPLOYER TO PROTECT THEIR EMPLOYEES VIOLATION OF PRIVACY ? |
bucco - i cruised thru the nlrb website and could not find any information to support the allegations as you posted them or as described in the articles you provided.
the closest i came to even finding a reference to home addresses is as follows: "current: The final voter list available to all parties contains only names and home addresses, which does not permit all parties to utilize modern technology to communicate with voters.
proposed: Phone numbers and email addresses (when available) would be included on the final voter list."
Proposed amendments to NLRB election rules and regulations fact sheet | NLRB
it appears that home addys are already provided in the representation process.
if you can come up with a specific rule change, i'd be happy to read it and comment.