FIRST of all, the "dictator" term, I believe was the choice of the write and not the poster.

Now, this executive order has to be kept in context....it is not the first executive order but each takes authority away from either the people or the US government.

It is suggested that this might be a good thing, but not sure that is the subject since countries have always signed agreements such as this with OTHER INDIVIDUAL countries, and not a flat out statment for all countries.

Now, this is ONE executive order....several recent ones include one concerning making it easier for the federal government to take private property.." In March, Obama signed an unnumbered Executive Order which provides the Federal government the power to confiscate land, infrastructure, and human resources in both peacetime, and during a declared crisis. One month later, the President issued an additional Executive Order which allows the government to nationalize, and take control of all natural gas resources."

Obama signs new Executive Order for U.S. to follow global economic regulations - National Finance Examiner | Examiner.com

The following quote is from the link above...

"Every day, more and more economic sovereignty is being signed away by the Obama Administration, with the intention of facilitating a new global economic system whereby the American people and American businesses no longer have the right of due process in the US legal system, but instead are bound under international law and regulation. This new Executive Order signed by President Obama on May 1st is another move towards global governance, and the loss of economic sovereignty for the citizens of the United States."

You can debate all you want about the plus and minus of trying to become part of a single economic system but having certain rights (you can argue all you want again how about you feel about that)...but having economie rights taken away by executive orders.

There has been no discussion, no press conferences, the President just signed them away with no conversation with congress.

This action alone is bothersome......and while the below does not directly refer to this thread...it is also bothersome to me....

"President Obama has held just one full length, multi-topic, solo press conference in the last six months, effectively abolishing the most accessible venue for American citizens to observe the thinking and learn the views of their leader.

It’s May, and the president has stood for only a single such news conference this year, a March 6 event in the briefing room. He’s had only three since last June, counting a November press conference in Hawaii that was supposed to be devoted to the just-held Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit but which veered off into other issues.

Nor does Obama generally allow questioning during brief appearances at the White House, such as when he makes statements with foreign leaders. Previous presidents, including George W. Bush, routinely took a couple of questions on the topic of the day at such gatherings."

Obama Abolishes the Press Conference | The Blog on Obama: White House Dossier