Quote:
Originally Posted by Villages Kahuna
Good suggestion.
I really can't fathom why people keep re-visiting criticisms of President Obama when he's already been in office for three years and has only six months until the next election. In fact, we're continually reminded by posters that they've been saying the same thing for three years. We know. We've been reading about it for three years. Don't you think we understand the criticisms after all this time? At this point, people either agree or disagree and more posts describing what was seen in the rear view mirror won't change anyone's mind.
It seems to me that we'd all be better off looking forward, understanding and discussing the issues currently facing the country and who might best address them, rather than looking backwards and saying, "I've been saying this for three years".
Who cares?
|
It's so difficult to discuss where Mitt Romney stands on the issues since he changes his positions almost daily. Yesterday, he said he believed in gay/lesbian adoptions, today he told a radio station in Charlotte that what he really meant was that most states allow gay adoptions.
The only issue he will talk about on the campaign trail is the economy, but he offers no details except lower taxes for the rich and less regulation. Actually, President Obama passed fewer regulations than George Bush had at this point in his term. How would those fewer regulations be working out for JPMorgan Chase and Jamie Dimon?
This week he said he would take credit for saving the auto industry, after penning his editorial "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt". Steve Rattner, who was at the table for the auto industry bailout, choked on that statement by Romney.
Last week RW bloggers had to know what Obama ate as a seven year old, but this week Romney's high school record is nobody's business.
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/not-so-fa...-gay-adoption/